Legal Opinion

Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. Wilkerson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1930No. 19838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNETT, C. C. B.

Wilkerson sought to recover of defendant on a policy of fire insurance covering real and personal property. The cause was tried to the court and plaintiff was awarded $500. Defendant appealed. The pleadings, in the usual form, disclosed the issuance of the policy and the destruction during the term of a part of the property covered. The property destroyed was a barn, grain, seeds, harness, wagon, and hay. Defendant relied upon the failure of plaintiff to disclose in his application the existence of a second mortgage whereby the policy became null and void. The parties will be…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Merrill v. . Agricultural Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Loehner v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  5. Bills v. Hibernia Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1895

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atlas Coal Corporation v. ScalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Rothman v. National Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API