Gibson v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The issue presented for our decision is whether the bail bond in suit was exonerated and the surety thereon discharged by operation of law when the trial court pronounced judgment-and-sentence. We answer in the negative.
The appellants were sureties on an appearance bond. After judgment-and-sentence was pronounced, the trial court set the defendant free for a few hours to allow him to take care of some personal business. When the defendant did not return, the judge gave notice of the bond’s forfeiture. The sureties’ motion to set it aside — filed less than two months later — was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. TingeySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Western Casualty & Guaranty Ins. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Clatsop County ex rel. Hildebrand v. FeldschauOregon Supreme Court · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Lum v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Terry v. GassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.