Legal Opinion
State v. Vaughn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 18, 2000No. 90,999PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDREAU, Justice:
1 1 Two questions are presented on certio-rari. First, did the trial court commit legal error when it determined that the State's filing of an amended information did not discharge the Bondsman's obligation on the bail bond? Second, did the trial court abuse its discretion in refusing to vacate its forfeiture order under 59 O.S. Supp.1995, 1382(C)(5)(b)? Because the trial court did not commit legal error and did not abuse its discretion in refusing to vacate its forfeiture order, we affirm.
L
FACTS
12 According to officer Wayne Drewey, at about 11:25 a.m. on April 25, 1995,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State v. HedrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Jones, Givens, Gotcher & Bogan, P.C. v. BergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Boston v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Robinson v. Oklahoma Nephrology Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Commonwealth v. HannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.