Legal Opinion
State v. Fish
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 4, 1988No. 66355PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Chief Justice.
The question presented on appeal is whether the legislature’s amendment of 59 O.S.Supp.1984, § 1332(3), striking the requirement that a bondsman show good cause for a principal’s failure to appear at trial because of incarceration by another court, excuses the bondsman in all other cases from the requirement that the principal or the bondsman present evidence of excusable neglect before a bond forfeiture will be set aside when the bondsman surrenders the principal to the court within thirty days of notice of the bond forfeiture.
The parties stipulate that: (1) Alex Fish…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Heidel v. Arizona State Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ramer v. State Ex Rel. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Boice v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Leigh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- Resolute Ins. Co. v. SEVENTH JUD. DIST. CT. OF OKL. CTY., OKL.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State ex rel. Department of Public Safety v. 1985 GMC Pickup, Serial 1GTBS14EOF2525894, OK Tag No. ZPE852Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Means v. Ten (10) Acres of LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.