Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided September 6, 1978No. NCM 78 0781PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Senior Judge:. Appellant asserts that two prosecution exhibits were improperly admitted in evidence over defense objection during the presentencing stage of the proceedings. The exhibits, page 13’s from appellant’s service record, reflect preservice use of drugs, a categorical rejection by appellant of their future abuse, and a recruiting waiver of their prior use enabling appellant to enlist. Trial counsel referred to these exhibits in *883his argument on sentence as indicating that appellant could not be trusted since he broke his promise “of never using drugs again” by possessing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. BarrettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SlubowskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. BarnesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  3. United States v. MitchellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  4. United States v. SaxonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  5. United States v. BowlesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API