Legal Opinion

United States v. Barrett

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 11, 1975No. 29,937PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In addition to the uncontested evidence of record, an unopposed and unre-butted post-trial affidavit from appellant’s mother indicates that the appellant elected to enter the Army in 1967 rather than serve a 4-year term in a Utah reformatory following his juvenile conviction for rape, breaking and entering, and assault.

As in United States v Catlow, 23 USCMA 142, 145, 48 CMR 758, 761 (1974), appellant did not of his own volition seek out a recruiting officer to enlist. Rather, an Army recruiter contacted appellant while he was confined and advised him "to enlist in the Army…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. United States v. SingletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. HutchinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. WagnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. BaileyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. HarrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API