United States v. Slubowski
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COOK, Judge:
We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred to the prejudice of appellant by the procedure he employed during the voir dire examination of the court members and by submitting written instructions to the members on the elements of the offenses.
The first issue is raised in the following context. During an Article 39(a)1 session, the military judge indicated he would follow a local rule of court which required defense and government counsel to submit proposed questions for the court members to him. He would, in turn, ask the questions. Although…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Billie Sol Estes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. NobleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Raymond John Wagner, Anthony Joseph Cambiano and Donald Vandergrift v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- Charles M. Oertle v. United States of America, Kenneth B. McCague v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. BradleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. AndersonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.