Legal Opinion

Hart-Parr Co. v. Krizan Maler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1919No. 6041PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, McLennan County-; H. M. Richey, Judge. Suit by Krizan & Maler against the Hart-Parr Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

Plaintiff in error, through its agent, S. M. McCracken, sold defendants in error a thrasher, for the agreed consideration of $930 — cash $300, notes $630 — retaining a mortgage on the thrasher. The plaintiff in error subsequently foreclosed its mortgage, and sold said thrasher for $375, and collected the remainder by suit against defendants in error.

Defendants in error brought this suit for damages, alleging that the thrasher was worthless to them for the purposes for which it was bought, and that they were induced to buy same through the fraudulent representations of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Burnett and WifeTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hindman v. First Nat. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  3. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. De WaltTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. International & Great Northern Railroad v. ShufordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Cresap v. ManorTexas Supreme Court · 1885

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Miller v. LathamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Maniatis v. Texas Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Hines v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Oliver v. HuckinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Kennedy v. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API