Legal Opinion

United States v. Long Elk

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1977No. Nos. 76-1385 to 76-1391, 76-1344 and 76-1401PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

These appeals raise an important question of whether federal jurisdiction exists over criminal offenses committed within *1034that portion of the Standing Rock Indian Reservation opened to settlement by a 1918 congressional enactment. The Government has charged the defendants in these cases with committing crimes in that territory. If the 1913 Act diminished the reservation, the charges must be dismissed, but if the Act did not diminish the reservation, the federal courts possess jurisdiction over the crimes allegedly committed by these defendants.

I. Background.

Two groups of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Puerto Rico v. Shell Co. (PR), Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Mattz v. ArnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Solem v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. David Collins CliffordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Male Juvenile (Pierre Y.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Joseph A. Russ, James Whipple, and the Covelo Indian Community of the Round Valley Indian Reservation, in Intervention and v. Richard E. Wilkins, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API