Legal Opinion

Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 27, 1976No. 74-1656PublishedCited by 680 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

We are called upon in these appeals to resolve several questions arising out of a conflict between the asserted taxing power of the State of Montana and the immunity claimed by the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (Tribe) and its members living on the tribal reservation. Convened as a three-judge court, 1 the District Court for the District of Montana considered separate attacks on the State’s cigarette sales and personal property taxes as applied to reservation Indians. After finding that the suits were not barred by the prohibition of 28 U. S. C. § 1341, 2 the District Court entered…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by680 opinions

  1. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Cynthia A. Richardson v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

675 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API