Legal Opinion

Goldsby v. Juricek

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 1965No. 40685PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

Herschul B. Goldsby and Martha S. Goldsby, husband and wife (plaintiffs below) appeal from a judgment in favor of Rudolph Juricek, an incompetent, and Frank Juricek, his guardian (defendants below) wherein the lower court denied plaintiffs’ action to cancel a certain mineral deed. Trial was to the court. Herschul B. Golds-by will be referred to as “Goldsby” and otherwise the parties will be referred to by name or by their trial court designation. Plaintiffs’ action was to cancel, on the grounds of duress and lack of consideration, a mineral deed wherein they conveyed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Berland's, Inc. of Tulsa v. Northside Village Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Raper v. ThornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Polish National Alliance of Brooklyn, U.S.A. v. White Eagle Hall Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Cacy v. CacySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Easterling v. FerrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Croslin v. Enerlex, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. In Re Seneca Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API