Legal Opinion
Davis v. National Bank of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 1960No. 38937, 38943, 38944, 38946, 38947PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Chief Justice.
The above styled and numbered appeals upon application of the parties were by order of this court consolidated and will be disposed of by this decision.
These are appeals on the original records. The plaintiffs in error are the son and daughters of Joseph D. Davis, now deceased. They commenced separate actions in the lower court against the defendant in error. The actions sought to establish gifts and trusts in connection therewith by Joseph D. Davis, during his lifetime, to and in favor of the respective plaintiffs in error and for an accounting thereof. Defendant in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Young v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Weil v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Appeal of WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Kaufmann's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Packer v. ClemsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Sandpiper North Apartments, Ltd. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Cacy v. CacySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Larman v. LarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.