Legal Opinion

Raper v. Thorn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1949No. 33753PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This action was instituted by defendant in error against plaintiffs in error to be decreed the equitable owner of a tract of 40 acres of land, the legal title to which was vested in plaintiffs in error, and for other relief. Upon trial to the court plaintiff was awarded judgment as prayed, and defendants appeal.

The material facts are substantially as follows:

Plaintiff, James E. Thorn, and defendant Grover C. Raper for years had owned and occupied farms in the same neighborhood and were warm friends. Between their farms and abutting each lay a tract of 120 acres of land consisting of three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loyd v. MaloneIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Cassidy v. HornorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Venner v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. McCaleb v. McKinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Spokane Savings & Loan Society v. Park Vista Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Powell v. ChastainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Nadel v. ZeligsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Goldsby v. JuricekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Crane v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  5. Terry v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API