Legal Opinion

Croslin v. Enerlex, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 2013No. 109,786PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

1 Charles D. Croslin,1 Glenn Croslin, and Irma Jean Gowin (plaintiffs) sued Enerlex, Inc. (defendant) seeking rescission of mineral deeds and tort damages. The dispositive issues on certiorari are: 1) whether the summary judgment record on appeal establishes that defendant owed the plaintiffs a duty to disclose the pooling order and the accrued mineral proceeds when it made an unsolicited offer to purchase their undivided mineral interest in Seminole County and provided the mineral deeds to be executed, and if so, 2) whether rescission of the mineral deeds is a remedy for defendant's breach…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Faulkenberry v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Bowman v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. Uptegraft v. Dome Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. HORTON v. HAMILTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. DANI v. MILLERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. SUTTON v. DAVID STANLEY CHEVROLETSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. Bristow First Assembly of God v. BP p.l.c.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API