Legal Opinion
Cacy v. Cacy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1980No. 52317PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The issue presented on certiorari is whether the first amended petition of the appellants, Lonnie K. Cacy and William H. Cacy, stated a cause of action. The appellants sought to impose a resulting or constructive trust on property in which legal title was vested in their stepfather, J. R. Phillips.
J. R. Phillips married Ola Cacy. Ola had two sons, Lonnie K. and William H. Ola and J. R. held all the property involved in this litigation in joint tenancy, with rights of survivorship. Ola died in 1970, and the property vested in J. R. He married Clara Phillips in 1971, and in the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Peyton v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Davis v. National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Morris v. LeverettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Powell v. ChastainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- McCaleb v. McKinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Reiss v. HagmannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Easterling v. FerrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Thomasi v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Matter of Estate of IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Hatoff v. Lemons & Associates, Inc. (In Re Lemons & Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1986
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.