Legal Opinion

Gross v. Gross

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1992No. 17824PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Betty Gross from the circuit court’s Amended Summary Judgment granting plaintiffs possession of certain properties which they held in joint tenancy with their deceased father, and denying defendant possession under her claim of homestead. We affirm.

FACTS

The following dates are relevant to this appeal:(1) April 13, 1976 — William Gross deeded the property in question 1 to his son Rodger and daughter-in-law Karen Gross as joint tenants. William was paid $9,000, the fair market value of the property at that time. Rodger and his wife also loaned William…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ruane v. MurraySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Niesent v. Homestake Mining Co. of CaliforniaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Parsons v. DacySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. In Re DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Beck v. LapsleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API