Legal Opinion

Ruane v. Murray

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1986No. 14741PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

Plaintiff Carole Ruane (Carole) appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Arnold Murray (Murray) on Count II of the complaint. We reverse and remand.

Carole filed this action alleging as Count II outrageous conduct. In essence, she claims: (1) that Murray had sexual intercourse with her knowing she has psychological problems, and that Murray knew or should have known that Carole was unable to resist his advances; (2) that subsequent to having intercourse with Carole, Murray continued to harass her by intimidation and vocal threats; and (3) that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ruple v. BrooksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. GridleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wangen v. KnudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API