Legal Opinion

In Re Davis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, the Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, Chief Judge, certified two questions for this Court: (1) Whether the last sentence of SDCL 43-45-3(2) violates Article VI § 18 of the South Dakota Constitution. (2) Whether the last sentence of SDCL 43-45-3(2) violates Article XXI § 4 of the South Dakota Constitution. On the first question, we rule in the negative, but on the second question, we hold that because the last sentence of SDCL 43-45-3(2) fails to set a limit on the amount of a homestead exemption that may…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Abdon Acevedo v. Nassau County, New York, Its Officials, Employees and AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Harvey v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. City of Aberdeen v. MeidingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. South Dakota Education Association/ NEA Ex Rel. Roberts v. BarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Z.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. KinsmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kraft v. Meade County Ex Rel. Board of County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Tibbs v. Moody County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People, in Interest of ZbSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API