Casey v. Casey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
¶ 1 The issue in the present cause is whether the trial court erred in entering judgment as a matter of law in favor of the Joint Tenants in its determination that Joint Tenants are sole owners of the joint tenancy property in question by virtue of right of survivorship and that Widow has no homestead interest in the property. Widow appealed, claiming a probate interest in the property pursuant to 58 O.S. § 311 and the COCA reversed and remanded with instructions in Widow’s favor. We hold that the trial court correctly entered judgment as a matter of law in favor of Joint Tenants as to this…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Flanders v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Fulsom v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Brown v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Andrew v. Depani-SparkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Toma v. TomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- City of Coweta v. DoughtenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE CO. v. POPESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE CO. v. POPESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.