Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Duggins

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1923No. 3882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

This action is to quiet plaintiff’s title to an undivided one-tentb interest in certain described real estate, situated in Gunnison City, Utah. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts, which are not disputed, are, in substance, as follows:

James Robbins, the owner of the entire estate of the property in controversy, died in 1886, leaving a will devising the property to Mary Childs Robbins for life, with remainder over to John Robbins and four others in equal shares. The will was probated, and the property distributed in accordance therewith in 1896.

John Robbins died…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meeks v. OlphertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Dignan v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Mansfield v. NeffUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Jenkins v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Moyes v. AgeeUtah Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Worley v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Parr v. Zions First National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Robbins v. Gunnison Valley BankUtah Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API