Legal Opinion

Meeks v. Olpherts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 15, 1880No. 70PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error to tbe Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

This action was brought, Sept. 30, 1872, by Meeks against Olpherts and others to recover possession of a hundred-vara lot in the city of San Francisco.

On a stipulation waiving a jury, the case was submitted to the court, which, on its findings of fact incorporated in this record, further found as a conclusion of law that the plaintiff’s action was barred by sect. 190 of the Probate Act of California. Judgment was rendered for the defendants. Meeks sued out this writ of error.

The material facts in the case are few and easily understood.

George Harlan died intestate July 8, 1850, seised of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Croxall v. ShererdSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Cunningham v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Harlan v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Trimble v. WoodheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Lamont v. VingerMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Dennis v. BintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McLeran v. BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API