Legal Opinion

Dignan v. Nelson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1903No. 1447PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Third District Court, Summit County. —Hon. S. W. Stewart, Judge. Action in ejectment. From a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, J.

This is an action in ejectment, instituted August 30, 1899, by the heirs of Dominick Dig-nan, deceased, to recover possession of lots 9, 10, i’l, 12, and 13, block 6, the same being situate in Park City, Utah. The plaintiffs Dominick P. and Joseph L. Dig-nan were minors, aged, respectively, twenty and eighteen years when this suit was brought. Emma McGill is the widow of Dominick Dignan and guardian of the minors. The defendants Eliza and Lila S. 'Nelson are the widow and daughter, respectively, of John A. Nelson, deceased, and the firm of Pickett & G-reeg were their tenants, all in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Smith v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. American Oak Leather Co. v. Union BankUtah Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Neary v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Grow v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Stanford v. GrayUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Allred Ex Rel. Jensen v. AllredUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Huntsman v. HuntsmanUtah Supreme Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API