Keeler v. Haky
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
An action for declaratory relief, injunction and damages was brought by plaintiffs, successors to the grantors and owners in fee of the servient estate, Lot 1, against defendants, successors to the grantees and owners in fee of the dominant estate, Lot 11, and the appurtenant easement thereto, to determine the rights of the parties in the easement created over Lot 1 under a grant deed dated April 17, 1934. The matter was heard before the court sitting without a jury. The trial judge found that the easement was created for the sole use and benefit of the defendants’ predecessors in interest…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Aladdin Petroleum Corporation v. Gold Crown PropertiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Cox v. Glenbrook CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Farnes v. Freeman LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.