Legal Opinion

Farnes v. Freeman Lane

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 16, 1968No. 41056PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to secure a declaration that a private easement in defendants’ favor across plaintiffs’ lakeshore property is one for access to the lake only and to obtain an injunction restraining defendants from constructing a dock and storing personal property bn or adjacent to the easement area. Defendants answered, contending that they have the right to construct and maintain a dock extending into the lake; to moor a boat at it; and to enjoy without restriction the rights of a riparian owner. The trial court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Delaney v. PondMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Badger v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Klotz v. HornIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Minneapolis Athletic Club v. CohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Burdette v. BRUSH MOUNTAIN ESTATES, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  5. Gwynn v. OurslerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API