Farnes v. Freeman Lane
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court.
Plaintiffs instituted this action to secure a declaration that a private easement in defendants’ favor across plaintiffs’ lakeshore property is one for access to the lake only and to obtain an injunction restraining defendants from constructing a dock and storing personal property bn or adjacent to the easement area. Defendants answered, contending that they have the right to construct and maintain a dock extending into the lake; to moor a boat at it; and to enjoy without restriction the rights of a riparian owner. The trial court…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Delaney v. PondMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Badger v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Klotz v. HornIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Minneapolis Athletic Club v. CohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Burdette v. BRUSH MOUNTAIN ESTATES, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- Gwynn v. OurslerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.