Bonner v. Lehfeldt
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco in proceedings supplementary to execution. John J. Van Nostrand, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
The appeal is from an order supplementary to execution directing the appellant, as debtor of the judgment debtor, to pay the amount of a judgment to the sheriff. The plaintiff’s affidavit follows the ordinary form in which the rendition of the judgment is set forth, together with the issue, levy, and unsatisfied return of execution. It was averred that Tremain, appellant, was a debtor of the judgment debtor in an amount exceeding $50, and that he refused to apply the money in his hands to the satisfaction otf the judgment. The order of examination, based on these averments, directed Tremain…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Hefner v. SealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Phillips v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Shain v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Couson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bond v. BulgheroniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- McCutcheon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Garland v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Smith v. Leh-FeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.