Phillips v. Price
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint was sustained. Plaintiff declined to further amend, and appeals from the resulting judgment against him.
The complaint is in two counts, and the question is whether either states a cause of action.
The first count alleges the following facts material to the point to be discussed: In 1898 a judgment was obtained in a justice’s court against W. B. Price .for $253.43. This judgment, now amounting to $340.65, no part of which has been paid, has been assigned to the plaintiff. After such assignment plaintiff caused an execution to be levied by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adams v. HackettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Herrlich v. KaufmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Pacific Bank v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Lewis v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Habenicht v. LissakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bond v. BulgheroniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Thomas v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Nordstrom v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- McCutcheon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.