Shain v. Peterson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the courts
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff as assignee of Knowls and Company to recover $667.17 for goods, wares, and merchandise, alleged to have been sold by said Knowls and Company to defendant. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for the full amount demanded, and from this judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial the defendant appeals.
The court made an order referring the case to one W. H. Barrows “to take the proof of all material allegations in the *487complaint, and to report the same to the court.” This order does not appear to have been made by consent, and the action was not of…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Imperial Bank v. Pim Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Martino v. DeneviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Gimbel v. LaramieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Darlington v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.