Legal Opinion

Wulfjen v. Dolton

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1944No. L. A. 18721PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a nonsuit, duly entered in the minutes of the court. Such an appeal may properly be taken because the order granting the nonsuit amounted in legal effect to a judgment of nonsuit. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581; Brown v. Sterling Furniture Co., 175 Cal. 563 [166 P. 322]; McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc., 11 Cal.2d 243 [78 P.2d 1010]; Lewis v. Hammond Lumber Co., 114 Cal.App. 390 [300 P. 49]; Spinner v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp., 52 Cal.App.2d 679 [126 P.2d 940].)

In reviewing the record herein, regard must be had for the rules of law which apply to cases…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Bosqui v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Herrlich v. KaufmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Wassermann v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pigeon Point Ranch, Inc. v. PerotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Brawthen v. H & R BLOCK, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Shelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. People v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Gwinn v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API