Legal Opinion
Yvette Ford v. Minneapolis Public Schools
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 15, 2014No. A13-1072PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
This whistleblower action is before us on remand from the supreme court for reconsideration in light of Sipe v. STS Mfg., Inc., 834 NW.2d 683 (Minn.2013). The district court granted summary judgment for respondent on the ground that appellant’s whistleblower claim was untimely under the two-year statute of limitations that applies to intentional torts. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Yvette Ford worked for respondent Minneapolis Public Schools. During the summer of 2007, appellant reported financial improprieties and budget discrepancies to the school-district…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- McDaniel v. United Hardware Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Larson v. New Richland Care CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Golden Gate National Senior Care LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Yvette Ford v. Minneapolis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Jung v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016