McDaniel v. United Hardware Distributing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Chief Justice.
Employer United Hardware Distributing appeals the court of appeals’ reversal of the trial court’s determination that McDaniel’s action under Minn.Stat. § 176.82 (1990), for retaliatory discharge for asserting workers’ compensation rights, is barred by the statute of limitations. United Hardware also claims that the court of appeals erred in holding that McDaniel was not required to exhaust his remedies under the collective bargaining agreement before bringing this section 176.82 claim.
I
McDaniel alleges the following facts: On June 24, 1986, McDaniel injured his knee while…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc., James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Petters Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.