Legal Opinion

Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1927No. 5083PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This action was brought by appellant on his own behalf, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, against respondent corporation to enjoin it and its officers and directors from issuing bonds of the corporation and using the proceeds thereof to buy up the water rights from 7,000 acres of land in the Salmon Eiver project, thus improving the water right for the balance of the project; to enjoin it from mortgaging the "entire irrigation system and all water rights of the project to secure payment of such bond issue; and from levying a continuing annual assessment on the stock of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  2. Santa Cruz Railroad v. SprecklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State v. Twin Falls-Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Sullivan v. Triunfo Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1870

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Big Wood Canal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API