Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Triunfo Gold & Silver Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870No. 1,084PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, C. J.

In Sullivan v. Triunfo Cold and Silver Mininy Company (29 Cal. 585), the question of the legality of the first assessment mentioned in the complaint, the one which was levied July 6, 1865, was considered, and it was held to be legal; and- it is claimed by the defendants that that question is res adjudícala' by virtue of that decision. The plaintiff insists, that in this case, he has stated a new fact, which did not ■ appear in the" former action; that it was not averred in the complaint in that case, but in this, that the assessment was not levied for the- purpose of paying the proper and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. Triunfo Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Santa Cruz Railroad v. SprecklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Andrews v. ReidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API