Schnittger v. Old Home Consolidated Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, C.
The Old Home Consolidated Mining Company is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, and having a board of five directors, who at the times herein considered were John McKewen, George T. Emery, Walter McG. Logan, P. Hahn, and C. W. Weld. August 16, 1897, it executed to the plaintiff’s. assignor its promissory note for five thousand dollars, payable two years thereafter, with interest at the rate of one per cent a month, and at the same time, for the purpose of securing its payment, executed a mortgage upon certain mining property within this state. The promissory note…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Beach v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Pauly v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Wright v. Oroville Gold, Silver, & Copper Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
- Santa Cruz Railroad v. SprecklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Peteler Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Baker v. PrattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Todd v. Temple Hospital Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Snediker v. AyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.