Gohde v. MSI Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. This appeal comes to us on remand from our supreme court. Bobbie and Rick Gohde appealed a summary judgment granted in favor of MSI Insurance Company. The circuit court determined the reducing clause in the Gohdes' underinsured motorist (UIM) policy, issued by MSI, was unambiguous. We summarily affirmed. Gohde v. MSI Ins. Co., No. 01-2121, unpublished slip op. (WI App March 26, 2002) (Gohde I).
The supreme court summarily reversed and ordered the parties to rebrief in light of its decision in Badger *315Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitz, 2002 WI 98, 255 Wis. 2d 61, 647 N.W.2d 223. We then concluded…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Sukala v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- Commercial Union Midwest Insurance v. VorbeckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Gohde v. MSI InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bellile v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Ruenger v. SoodsmaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- ACUITY v. Estate of Michael ShimetaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Klinger v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Allstate Insur Co v. Keca, Donna E.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.