Sukala v. Heritage Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P.J.
¶ 1. Dawn and John Sukala appeal from a judgment declaring underinsured motorist (UIM) reducing clauses in two auto insurance policies valid and enforceable. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company and Western National Mutual Insurance Company issued the policies. The Sukalas argue that the Heritage reducing clause is invalid because Heritage failed to comply with statutory notice requirements when the clause became enforceable under new legislation. We conclude that the statutory notice requirements do not apply because the change in coverage was not initiated by Heritage, but instead resulted…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Jackson v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Wisconsin Label Corp. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Donna E. Keca and Trisha Bontempo, Individually and as Guardian of Miranda BontempoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Sukala v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Dowhower v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Janssen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.