Legal Opinion

Korpa v. Stuyvesant Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1975No. Appeals, Nos. 271 and 277PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, P.J.,

These are appeals from the entry of compulsory non-suits by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Civil Division, against the plaintiff-appellant, Mildred Korpa, in an assumpsit action and against the defendant-appellant, Stuyvesant Life Insurance Company, on its counterclaim; and from the action of the court en banc in refusing to remove the nonsuits.

Korpa was employed in 1966 by Siltronics, Inc. as a machine operator. On November 16, 1966, she injured her neck and shoulder while operating a press. Due to this injury she was unable to work and received…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy & Slota v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. McNett v. BriggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Gatens v. VrabelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Norman v. World Wide Distributors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Sachritz v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Van Riper v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of USDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Cerami v. DignazioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Adams v. EulianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API