Legal Opinion

Murphy & Slota v. Burke

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1973No. Appeals, Nos. 193 and 104PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeroy,

The appellants, L. Francis Murphy and Robert E. Slota, are attorneys and members of the Bar of Montgomery County. They brought an action in equity against the Norristown, Pennsylvania law firm of Haws & Burke, a professional corporation, and against Thomas J. Burke, James S. Kilpatrick, Jr. and Ralph L. Hose, the three lawyers practicing in that firm. In their complaint plaintiffs recited that “for some period up until June of 1971, [they] were associated with the individual defendants in the practice of law” and that “plaintiffs are entitled to the possession of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fried v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Northwestern National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Kennedy's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Bell v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Central Storage & Transfer Co. v. KaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Shoemaker v. Commonwealth BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Engstrom v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Sachritz v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Steinke v. Sungard Financial Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API