Legal Opinion

Adams v. Euliano

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1982No. 111PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

Appellants, Adams, Feidler and Bojarski, appeal from the order of the trial court denying their motion to take off a compulsory nonsuit. We reverse and remand for trial.

In PeAir v. Home Ass’n of Enola Legion No. 751, 287 Pa.Super. 400, 403-404, 430 A.2d 665, 666-667 (1981), we said:

A nonsuit should be entered only in a clear case. McMillan v. Mountain Laurel Racing Inc., 240 Pa.Super. 248, 367 A.2d 1106 (1976); DiGiannantonio v. Pittsburgh R. Co., 402 Pa. 27, 166 A.2d 28 (1960); Dunmore v. McMillan, 396 Pa. 472, 152 A.2d 708 (1959). In describing how clear the case must be, it…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Thomas v. SEAMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cashdollar v. Mercy HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Fannin v. CrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Schlagel v. LombardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Bowser v. Hershey Baseball Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. McCrery v. ScioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API