Sachritz v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Justice.
In this case the Superior Court held appellant’s claim for “post-mortem” work loss benefits was barred by the two year statute of limitations in Section 106(c)(1) of the No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, No. 176 §§ 101-701, 40 P.S, §§ 1009.101-1009.701 (Supp.1982). We granted review to consider the applicability of the limitations provisions of Sections 106(c)(1) and 106(c)(2) of the Act to the various types of no-fault benefits the legislature has provided in partial replacement of traditional tort damages for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Murphy & Slota v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Stegner v. FentonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- France's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Kamperis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Jones v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Miller v. Federal Kemper InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Guiton v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Warren v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.