Legal Opinion

Sachritz v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1982No. 28 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1982PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

In this case the Superior Court held appellant’s claim for “post-mortem” work loss benefits was barred by the two year statute of limitations in Section 106(c)(1) of the No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, No. 176 §§ 101-701, 40 P.S, §§ 1009.101-1009.701 (Supp.1982). We granted review to consider the applicability of the limitations provisions of Sections 106(c)(1) and 106(c)(2) of the Act to the various types of no-fault benefits the legislature has provided in partial replacement of traditional tort damages for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Murphy & Slota v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Stegner v. FentonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. France's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Kamperis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Jones v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Miller v. Federal Kemper InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Guiton v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Warren v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API