Legal Opinion

Cerami v. Dignazio

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 1980No. 2543 and 3035PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

This case involves cross appeals taken from two final decrees entered in an equity action instituted by plaintiffs to establish their status and rights in the corporate defendant; and the alleged obligations of the individual defendants. The events giving rise to the respective appeals are as follows:

I. Plaintiffs’ Appeal

After defendants responded to plaintiffs’ complaint with, among other things, a counterclaim, pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 213(b), the chancellor ordered a separate trial limited to the issues of plaintiffs’ right to ownership of shares of BEDI, Inc., and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. College Watercolor Group, Inc. v. William H. Newbauer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Blofsen v. CUTAIARSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Northwestern National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Chateaugay Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Ravin, Inc. v. First City Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Schuylkill Products, Inc. v. H. Rupert & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Gee v. Blue Stone Heights Hunting Club, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. LTV Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API