Legal Opinion
State v. Haney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1946No. 34,183PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
This case is here for the second time. Our opinion on the first appeal is reported in State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518, 18 N. W. (2d) 315. On the first trial, defendant was found guilty of the crime of carnal knowledge, and an order denying a new trial was reversed because of prejudicial error in the admission of evidence.
On the second trial, defendant was again found guilty. A motion for a new trial on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence, improper conduct of counsel, and the admission of certain evidence as prejudicial error was denied, and defendant again appeals.
A…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. TiedtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Garner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. StufflebeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. CoursolleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.