In re Name Change of SIMPKINS
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge
On appeal from dismissal of his name-change proceeding for failure to appear at the hearing, Winston Myles Simpkins, a federal prison inmate, claims that the district court’s denial of his requests to (1) appear by telephone conference; or (2) issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testifican-dum directing the sheriff to transport him to the district courthouse for the hearing violated his First Amendment right to religious freedom. He also asserts that the district court’s denial of his motion to depose prison staff violated his Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process. We…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Salaam v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Mehralian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re ArnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In Re SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999