Legal Opinion

In re Name Change of SIMPKINS

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1999No. C9-98-2266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge

On appeal from dismissal of his name-change proceeding for failure to appear at the hearing, Winston Myles Simpkins, a federal prison inmate, claims that the district court’s denial of his requests to (1) appear by telephone conference; or (2) issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testifican-dum directing the sheriff to transport him to the district courthouse for the hearing violated his First Amendment right to religious freedom. He also asserts that the district court’s denial of his motion to depose prison staff violated his Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Salaam v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Mehralian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ArnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. In Re SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API