Legal Opinion

State, Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board v. Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 2003No. A03-52, A03-434Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board (the board) brought a declaratory judgment action against respondent Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (the DFL). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the DFL, concluding that the DFL properly reported that expenditures for certain mailings were multicandi-date expenditures on behalf of three or more candidates. The district court also awarded attorney fees to the DFL under the Minnesota Equal Access to Justice Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 15.471-474 (2000). In these consolidated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API