Spencer v. Troutt
California Supreme Court
MANDAMUS from the Supreme Court to a Judge of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is a proceeding for a writ of mandate to require the respondent to determine the amount of a stay bond on an appeal from a judgment for the possession of land, rendered against the petitioner. The judgment was rendered in an action brought by Julius Baum, now deceased, against petitioner, and Edward Roper and Kate Roper, wife of said Edward Roper.
Respondent’s answer, which was admitted to be in all respects true, shows that on the sixth day of February, 1897, a decision was rendered in said cause, as follows: “That plaintiff is entitled to a judgment that plaintiff do have and recover of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fallon v. BrittanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Savings & Loan Society v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Estate of DevincenziCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by18 opinions
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Alonso v. HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- DeGrandchamp v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.