Fallon v. Brittan
California Supreme Court
Motion to stay proceedings pending an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from orders amending the record and appointing new referees. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
Action for the partition of five several parcels of land, held by the parties as tenants in common; two situate in the city and county of San Francisco, two situate in the city of San José, and one situate in the *512county of Santa Cruz. Interlocutory decree entered, January 5, 1888, determining the interests of the respective parties, adjudging that as to two of said parcels, one situate in San Francisco and one in San José, partition could not be made without material injury to the interests of the parties, and directing that as to these two lots they be sold for purposes of partition; that as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Swain v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Rousset v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Savings & Loan Society v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by17 opinions
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Providence Baptist Church v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Fay v. StubenrauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.