Legal Opinion

Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 5, 1953No. 57300; protest 186275-K/3795 (Chicago)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case relates to two items of merchandise, described on the invoice as “Buckle Lighter — Hard Chrome finish,” and “Buckle Lighter Gold finish.”

*442The collector regarded the components of the articles as separate entities and assessed duty accordingly. The lighters were assessed with duty at combined rates equivalent to 110 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1527 (c) (2), as originally enacted, and the buckles were assessed with duty at the rate of 65 per centum under paragraph 1527 (c) (2), as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898.

Plaint…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Horstmann Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. V. Alexander & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Camera Specialty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API