Legal Opinion

Camera Specialty Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 18, 1956No. C. D. 1814PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

An importation, consisting of various cameras “with eveready cases,” was separately classified by the collector. The cameras were classified at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1551 of the Tariff-Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52739, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, T. D. 52820, as “Photographic cameras not specially provided for.” The cases were classified at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1531 of the said act, as modified by the General Agreement on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. Naumes Forwarding Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lafayette Electronics Mfg. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Shalom Baby Wear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API