E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, is designated on the invoices as coat brush shoehorn, combination clothesbrush and shoehorn (Groomaide), and folding shoehorn with brush. The articles were imported from Japan in 1959 and I9601 and were assessed with duty at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1506 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Protocol of Terms of Accession by Japan to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865, and T.D. 53877, on the brush portion, and at 17 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 339 of said…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- James Betesh Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Arnart Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- United States v. Myers & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hollywood Accessories, Division of Allen Electronics & Equip. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Fisher Galleries v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Altray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- CR Industries v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986