Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Paul

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1973No. 10980PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants Arthur Donald and Florence R. Watkins brought this action for specific performance of a right to purchase under a “first refusal” provision contained in an “option agreement” entered into by the plaintiffs-appellants, as optionees, and the defendant Paul and his wife, as optionors.

The Paul-Watkins option agreement was executed on January 22, 1964, at which time the Pauls were the record owners of three contiguous tracts of land, designated and referred to in the agreement as “Tract I,” “Tract II,” and “Tract III.” (Tract III is not involved in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Straley v. Idaho Nuclear CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rawlings v. Layne & Bowler Pump CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. John R. Miller v. Lesea Broadcasting, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Murr v. Selag Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Perron v. HaleIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Eckels v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Meikle v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API