Legal Opinion

Perron v. Hale

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1985No. 15156PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

The buyers of a house have appealed the trial court’s judgment validating an earnest money agreement and granting specific performance to the sellers. Finding no error, we affirm.

On October 2, 1980, plaintiffs entered into an earnest money agreement to purchase a house newly built in Cascade, Idaho, from defendants Blaser and Barrell. At this time, plaintiffs were visiting Cascade from their residence in Nevada, and they stayed two nights in the house. The buyers, sellers and defendant Hale, the realtor, were all present at the meeting in which the agreement was executed. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shields & Co., Inc. v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Shakey's Incorporated v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Tombari v. GrieppWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mecham v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Garner v. BartschiIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Kessler v. Tortoise Development, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Fazzio v. MasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. TKO Properties, LLC v. Young (In Re Young)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1997
  5. Barker v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API